Executive Order 14250high43% model agreement

Executive Order 14250

📅 Signed: February 16, 2026🔬 7 analyses🤖 7 models: z-ai/glm-5, gpt-4o-mini, deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528, qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b, moonshotai/kimi-k2.5, deepseek/deepseek-v3.2, google/gemini-3-flash-preview
6.7
Avg Threat Score
out of 10

📄 Original Executive Order (PDF)

Open PDF ↗

AI Analysis Results

7 analyses from 7 models

Score Breakdown
Overall Assessment

This Executive Order represents a critical threat to democratic governance. It weaponizes executive authority to punish a specific law firm for representing clients and employing lawyers who investigated the President. The order bypasses all due process, imposes collective punishment on all firm employees, and creates a surveillance mechanism requiring contractors to disclose business relationships. Most alarming is the chilling effect: if law firms face government retaliation for representing certain clients or employing certain lawyers, the legal profession cannot function as a check on executive power. The reference to a similar order against Perkins Coie indicates this is not an isolated action but a systematic campaign to neutralize legal opposition. Historical patterns show that targeting lawyers is a predictable early step in democratic breakdown, as seen in authoritarian regimes worldwide. The order transforms protected legal activity into grounds for government punishment, fundamentally inverting the rule of law.

⚠ Urgent Concerns
  • Immediate chilling effect on legal representation challenging executive authority
  • Pattern of targeting multiple law firms suggests systematic campaign rather than isolated action
  • Security clearance revocations affect not just government contracts but clients across all sectors
  • No due process before punitive measures take effect - punishment first, review later
  • Vague standards ('national interest', 'American interests') can be applied to any firm or individual
Recommendations
  • Immediate legal challenge on First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and Bill of Attainder grounds
  • Congressional oversight hearings on pattern of targeting law firms
  • Bar association intervention to defend independence of legal profession
  • Judicial review of security clearance revocations as retaliatory and arbitrary
  • Documentation of all firms similarly targeted to establish pattern for legal and political response
Average Threat Score
6.7
out of 10
Model Agreement
43%
consensus
z-ai/glm-5gpt-4o-minideepseek/deepseek-r1-0528qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17bmoonshotai/kimi-k2.5deepseek/deepseek-v3.2google/gemini-3-flash-preview
Score Breakdown
Score Ranges
Rule Of Law6.8
Min: 4.2Max: 9.5
Democratic Erosion6.6
Min: 3.5Max: 9.0
Power Consolidation7.0
Min: 5.0Max: 8.8
Historical Precedent6.1
Min: 3.5Max: 8.4
Authoritarian6.9
Min: 4.0Max: 9.2
Constitutional Violations6.9
Min: 5.0Max: 8.5