Executive Order 14288high65% model agreement

Executive Order 14288

📅 Signed: February 16, 2026🔬 17 analyses🤖 17 models: moonshotai/kimi-k3, gpt-5.4-mini, gpt-oss, qwen3.5:9b, microsoft/phi-4, x-ai/grok-4-fast, anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6, z-ai/glm-5, gpt-4o-mini, deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528, qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b, moonshotai/kimi-k2.5, deepseek/deepseek-v3.2, google/gemini-3-flash-preview, zai-org/glm-4.7-flash, qwen3:30b-a3b-q8_0, gemma3n:e4b-it-q8_0
6.1
Avg Threat Score
out of 10

📄 Original Executive Order (PDF)

AI Analysis Results

17 analyses from 17 models

Score Breakdown
Overall Assessment

This document shows moderate constitutional concerns with an overall threat score of 65/100. Key concerns include: The combination of impunity mechanisms for police (Sections 2, 3(b)) with threats of federal prosecution against local officials (Section 5) creates a one-two authoritarian pattern: protect the coercive arm, criminalize resistance to it; Section 4(b): directing the Secretary of Defense to plan for using military assets and 'personnel' to 'prevent crime' is the most direct assault on the constitutional boundary between military and civilian spheres.

Average Threat Score
6.1
out of 10
Model Agreement
65%
consensus
moonshotai/kimi-k3gpt-5.4-minigpt-ossqwen3.5:9bmicrosoft/phi-4x-ai/grok-4-fastanthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6z-ai/glm-5gpt-4o-minideepseek/deepseek-r1-0528qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17bmoonshotai/kimi-k2.5deepseek/deepseek-v3.2google/gemini-3-flash-previewzai-org/glm-4.7-flashqwen3:30b-a3b-q8_0gemma3n:e4b-it-q8_0
Score Breakdown
Score Ranges
Rule Of Law6.0
Min: 4.5Max: 8.0
Democratic Erosion5.6
Min: 4.0Max: 8.4
Power Consolidation6.6
Min: 4.5Max: 8.8
Historical Precedent5.1
Min: 3.5Max: 7.9
Authoritarian6.1
Min: 4.5Max: 8.5
Constitutional Violations6.1
Min: 5.0Max: 7.8