Executive Order 14360moderate53% model agreement

Executive Order 14360

📅 Signed: February 16, 2026🔬 17 analyses🤖 17 models: qwen3.6:35b-mlx, moonshotai/kimi-k3, gpt-5.4-mini, qwen3:30b-a3b-q8_0, gemma3n:e4b-it-q8_0, gpt-oss, zai-org/glm-4.7-flash, microsoft/phi-4, x-ai/grok-4-fast, anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6, deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528, moonshotai/kimi-k2.5, z-ai/glm-5, deepseek/deepseek-v3.2, qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b, google/gemini-3-flash-preview, gpt-4o-mini
4.5
Avg Threat Score
out of 10

📄 Original Executive Order (PDF)

AI Analysis Results

17 analyses from 17 models

Score Breakdown
Overall Assessment

Executive Order 14360 represents a routine administrative adjustment to reciprocal tariff schedules under pre-existing national emergency declarations. Across all six analytical frameworks, the document exhibits minimal indicators of authoritarian overreach or constitutional degradation. It operates strictly within established statutory delegations (IEEPA, Trade Act of 1974, National Emergencies Act), maintains standard procedural safeguards (Federal Register publication, severability clauses, appropriation requirements), and relies on interagency monitoring rather than unilateral decree. The document reflects standard executive trade management practices historically consistent with U.S. constitutional practice and administrative law. No evidence suggests erosion of democratic norms, consolidation of unchecked power, or degradation of the rule of law.

⚠ Urgent Concerns
  • None identified; document aligns with standard executive authority for trade policy adjustment
  • No indicators of constitutional overreach, democratic backsliding, or authoritarian pattern emergence
Recommendations
  • Continue routine statutory and judicial oversight of tariff implementation to ensure compliance with HTSUS classifications
  • Maintain transparency in interagency consultations regarding emergency economic declarations to preserve institutional accountability
Average Threat Score
4.5
out of 10
Model Agreement
53%
consensus
qwen3.6:35b-mlxmoonshotai/kimi-k3gpt-5.4-miniqwen3:30b-a3b-q8_0gemma3n:e4b-it-q8_0gpt-osszai-org/glm-4.7-flashmicrosoft/phi-4x-ai/grok-4-fastanthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528moonshotai/kimi-k2.5z-ai/glm-5deepseek/deepseek-v3.2qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17bgoogle/gemini-3-flash-previewgpt-4o-mini
Score Breakdown
Score Ranges
Authoritarian4.4
Min: 1.2Max: 7.0
Constitutional Violations4.5
Min: 0.8Max: 7.5
Democratic Erosion3.7
Min: 1.0Max: 6.0
Power Consolidation5.1
Min: 1.8Max: 7.5
Rule Of Law4.2
Min: 1.4Max: 6.8
Historical Precedent4.1
Min: 1.5Max: 6.4