Executive Order 14161high53% model agreement

Executive Order 14161

📅 Signed: February 16, 2026🔬 17 analyses🤖 17 models: qwen3.6:35b-mlx, moonshotai/kimi-k3, gpt-5.4-mini, zai-org/glm-4.7-flash, microsoft/phi-4, x-ai/grok-4-fast, anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6, z-ai/glm-5, gpt-4o-mini, deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528, qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b, moonshotai/kimi-k2.5, google/gemini-3-flash-preview, deepseek/deepseek-v3.2, gpt-oss, qwen3:30b-a3b-q8_0, gemma3n:e4b-it-q8_0
6.7
Avg Threat Score
out of 10

📄 Original Executive Order (PDF)

AI Analysis Results

17 analyses from 17 models

Score Breakdown
Overall Assessment

Executive Order 14161 operates primarily within established statutory and constitutional frameworks governing immigration and national security. The document exercises broad presidential discretion under the Immigration and Nationality Act to enhance vetting standards, establish interagency reporting structures, and authorize potential entry suspensions based on deficient foreign screening information. While the EO employs subjective ideological criteria that raise moderate concerns regarding arbitrary enforcement and First Amendment tensions, it does not exhibit explicit authoritarian overreach, institutional dismantling, or direct constitutional violations. The threat profile reflects a standard exercise of executive authority over immigration policy, with moderate risks stemming from vague standards and centralized reporting mechanisms rather than systemic democratic erosion.

⚠ Urgent Concerns
  • Subjective ideological screening criteria may conflict with First Amendment protections if applied without clear procedural safeguards
  • Lack of explicit due process mechanisms for discretionary visa denials increases risk of arbitrary enforcement
Recommendations
  • Implement transparent procedural guidelines and judicial review mechanisms for ideological and security-based screening decisions
  • Ensure statutory delegation under INA §212(f) is applied consistently with constitutional due process requirements and non-discrimination principles
Average Threat Score
6.7
out of 10
Model Agreement
53%
consensus
qwen3.6:35b-mlxmoonshotai/kimi-k3gpt-5.4-minizai-org/glm-4.7-flashmicrosoft/phi-4x-ai/grok-4-fastanthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6z-ai/glm-5gpt-4o-minideepseek/deepseek-r1-0528qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17bmoonshotai/kimi-k2.5google/gemini-3-flash-previewdeepseek/deepseek-v3.2gpt-ossqwen3:30b-a3b-q8_0gemma3n:e4b-it-q8_0
Score Breakdown
Score Ranges
Authoritarian6.3
Min: 3.8Max: 8.2
Constitutional Violations7.4
Min: 3.6Max: 9.5
Democratic Erosion5.9
Min: 3.2Max: 8.0
Power Consolidation6.5
Min: 4.0Max: 8.5
Rule Of Law6.8
Min: 3.7Max: 9.2
Historical Precedent5.9
Min: 3.5Max: 8.5